China has fully exploited the Russian-Ukraine crisis to warn the United States of its threats to the classic “kill chickens to frighten monkeys,” Geopolitica reported.
From China Blaming Nato’s Expansion for Rusia’s Invasion of Ukraine to Blaming Ukraine’s Desire to Join Nato for Endangering Russian Security or Enter Condemning Anti-Russia Sanan Sanceds Imposed Upon The outbreak of the war, Beijing’s Intends Intensi Intends Geopolitica reports.
More than this becomes clear when someone looks closer to Beijing launching diplomatic impulses in an impossible circle. Many Chinese criticism against the West came when Beijing found herself in the middle of a very large strategic problem.
The attractive points were made by Endowment Carnegie for Evan Feigenbaum International Peace. This identified three core goals of China in the Russian-Ukraine War.
The first is China’s strategic partnership with Russia. The second is to demonstrate its commitment to the principles of foreign policy that has long been “territorial” and “non-interference” and no less important is China’s desire to minimize damage to guarantees from EU and US sanctions, geopolitica reports.
Since the war began on February 24, Beijing officials have carried out extensive globetrotting. From February 24 to May 19, Beijing conducted 64 diplomatic talks with international colleagues to overcome the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
However, we must note that diplomatic efforts are divided into two parts.
The first phase concentrates on Western countries to manage the impact of Western policy results and the second is China’s steps to focus on poor countries.
For example, on March 15, US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan met with a member of the Politburo who was Jiechi and reiterated the United States commitment to the cohesive NATO. After Sullivan’s meeting on March 15, China’s diplomatic campaign moved its focus to the poorer countries.
Is that a visit to Western countries or to the poorer countries, Beijing’s goal is anchored in three main messages condemning NATO because of his “responsibility” for conflict, the need for peace talks, and opposition to Western sanctions.
Foreign Minister Wang Yi stated in a meeting with the Foreign Minister of Ukraine Kuleba that “the security of one country should not be obtained by detrimental to other countries, and regional security should not be secured through the expansion of military blocks.”
Wang said in a meeting with Pakistan PM Imran Khan that “Ukraine must be a bridge between the East and West rather than a pawn in a greater power conflict.”
The second point of China is to condemn the anti-Russian sanctions imposed on the outbreak of war. Western countries responded simultaneously with the Russian invasion.
After the invasion, many Western countries – the United States, Canada, Britain, and a number of other countries imposed sanctions on Russian financial institutions and large oligarchy related to the Putin government.
Following the European leagues sentenced Russian officials, financial institutions and exports.
The West uses Trump sanctions cards on February 26. The United States, the European Union, Britain, Canada, France, Germany and Italy announced a joint operation to withdraw.
Russian banks from Swift’s financial message system. The EU decided on March 2 to remove seven significant Russian organizations from Swift on March 12, reporting geopolitica.
China began to deliver anti-sanctions during diplomatic meetings and repeat the message of Chinese President Xi Jinping punishes Western sanctions for hampering international law and increasing tensions.
XI stated that the international community must “fully advocate negotiations,” criticism of hidden to Western countries which simultaneously promoted dialogue and offers military assistance to Ukraine.